YOU POINT THEM TO COMPANY FILINGS SHOWING EXTREMELY OUTRAGEOUS COMPENSATION AUTHORIZED TO ONE PERSON THEN YOU POINT OUT THAT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHICH AUTHORISED THAT WAS COMPRISED OF ONLY THAT PERSON HIMSELF BUT STILL THEY PRETEND THAT THEY MISSED THE POINT AND QUESTION WERE THE "MISSTATEMENT OR OMISSION" IN THOSE FILINGS WHEN APPLYING THE 10B-5 AS IF THE INTENTION IN CITING THOSE FILINGS IS TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MISLEADING IN THE WAY THE ACTIONS REPORTED IN THOSE FILINGS WERE CONVEYED NOT THE ACTIONS THEMSELVES. HOW COULD THE SUPREME CRAP'S ACCEPTANCE TO THAT ACTION CONSTITUTES A GOOD BEHAVIOR?
No comments:
Post a Comment