AGAIN, EVEN IF THERE WAS NOTHING THAT CAN APPLY ON MY CASE IN ITS REASONS FOR GRANTING A PETITION, THE CRAP SHOULD STILL HAVE GRANTED THE PETITION. WHY? BECAUSE THEIR DISCRETION IN TAKING CASES CANNOT SUPERSEDES OR OVERRIDE THE CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT TO ACT WITH "GOOD BEHAVIOR". SO ASK YOURSELF THIS QUESTION: DOES REFUSING A CASE WITH THAT LEVEL OF DIRECT OUTRAGEOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE ACTIONS BY LOWER COURTS CONSTITUTES A GOOD BEHAVIOR?
No comments:
Post a Comment