73

HERE IS HOW THE DENYING OF MY PETITION BECAUSE OF THE REASON I MENTIONED IN THE POST BELOW SEEMS TO BE DECIDED.

THE GUY INSISTED ON USING ONLY THAT PHONE CALLING PATH AS A WAY TO REACH ME BECAUSE IT WAS NOT LEADING TO CONTACT, IN ORDER TO USE IT AS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST ME. THE GUY ALSO ESTABLISHED A CONNECTION TO THOSE NINE THROUGH SOMEONE WITH WHOM HE SHARES A GROUP IDENTITY AND THAT PERSON KEPT CONVEYING TO THE REST HOW I AM NOT PICKING UP THE PHONE SUGGESTING THAT ARGUMENT TO THEM. THE EXISTENCE OF THAT CONNECTION IS SUPPORTED BOTH WAYS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PICTURE BECAUSE THERE IS ONLY LITTLE PROBABILITY THE CORRUPTION GUY INSISTED AND CONTINUED ON THAT PATH TO THAT DEGREE WITHOUT SOMEONE FROM INSIDE PROVIDING FEEDBACK ABOUT ITS EFFECT ON THE REST. GRADUALLY THE IDENTITY COMPLEX OF THE REST CAUSED THEM TO JOIN THAT MEMBER TAKING A BIASED POSITION AGAINST ME. THAT WAS ALSO HELPED BY THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE POSITION OF THE PRESIDENT TOWARD THIS EVEN ASSUMING HE DID NOT DIRECTLY CALLS ON THEM TO TAKE THAT STAND WITH HIM.