26

CONTINUING WITH THE PROCEDURAL HANDLING OF MY CASE, HOW ABOUT HOW THE DISTRICT  COURT ISSUING ON ITS OWN ORDERS FOR ME TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT AFTER ITSELF HAD MADE IT UNUSABLE BECAUSE IT RULED THAT I BROUGHT  DERIVATIVE CLAIMS IN A DIRECT WAY THEN DISMISSING MY COMPLAINT AGAINST THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE BECAUSE OF THAT WHICH WOULD STILL HAVE BEEN IN VIOLATION OF RULE 4 EVEN IF ISSUING THOSE ORDERS MADE REASONABLE SENSE? THE APPELLATE COURT DID NOT SEE ANY THING SUSPICIOUS IN THAT AND IN FACT  AGREED THAT IT WAS CORRECT FOR THE LOWER COURT TO DISMISS MY COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO OBEY THOSE ORDERS EXCEPT THAT LOWER PUNISHMENTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN APPLIED FIRST. 

HOW ABOUT STARTING MY CASE WITH ORDER TRUNCATING RULE 4 TIME TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT? HOW OFTEN DO YOU SEE THAT?  AND THE APPELLATE COURT HAVING NO PROBLEM WITH WHY THAT ORDER WAS ISSUED IN THE FIRST PLACE? DID THE APPELLATE COURT SUFFICIENTLY HOLD THE DISTRICT COURT RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS ACTIONS OR WAS IT COMPLICIT AND TRYING TO UNFAIRLY COVER FOR IT AND JUSTIFY THOSE ACTIONS?  NOTHING HERE CALLS ON THE SUPREME CRAP TO GRANT THE PETITION?