27

SPEAKING ABOUT PROCEDURAL HANDLING THERE IS A CASE ALSO WITH THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT IN WHICH THAT COURT DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR SOMEONE TO UPDATE HIS FILING AFTER KNOWING ABOUT NEWLY RELATED RULING FROM THE UPPER CRAP THAT MADE A RELATED RULING FROM THAT COURT NO LONGER APPLICABLE. THE PETITION WAS DENIED. HOWEVER 2 OF THOSE WORKING IN THAT CRAP VOTED TO TAKE THE CASE WHILE THREE OF THE OTHERS WROTE AN OPINION IN WHICH  AFTER ARGUING FOR THE PETITIONER SIDE AND EMPHASIZING HOW THAT ACTION CAN HAPPEN ONLY IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT THEY STATED THAT THEY PREFER TO LEAVE "for now" THAT ISSUE FOR THAT COURT TO CORRECT ITSELF. HERE IS THAT OPINION:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-10639_q8l1.pdf

HOW ABOUT ALL WHAT THAT COURT DID IN MY CASE AND WHY SUCH FLEXIBILITY IN THINKING WAS NOT APPLIED TO IT?