51

IT IS HARD TO AVOID SEEING THAT THIS COURT AND THE PRESIDENT AND THIS CORRUPTION GUY ALL CONSPIRED TOGETHER IN MAKING THIS DENIAL TO MY PETITION.

I HAVE WHAT TO ME STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT THIS GUY KNEW ABOUT THE RESULT OF THE CONFERENCE OF 5/14/2015 REGARDING MY PETITION BEFORE RELEASING IT ON MONDAY. TO A LESSER DEGREE, THE PRESIDENT ALSO SEEMED LIKELY TO HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THE END RESULT NOT ONLY BEFORE RELEASING IT BUT ALSO BEFORE THE CONFERENCE OF 5/14/2015 IN DAYS.

BASED ON THE SIGNS I SAW,TO THINK THAT THIS DENIAL TO MY PETITION WAS NOT ARRANGED WITH THIS COURT SOUNDS LIKE A VERY UNREALISTIC EXPECTATION HERE. YES, CONNECTING WITH AND INFLUENCING THIS COURT COULD BE MUCH HARDER THAN MOST OTHER COURTS IN THE COUNTRY BUT IT SEEMS TO BE FAR LESS IMMUNE FROM WHAT PEOPLE MAY EXPECT FROM A "SUPREME COURT" FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY. IF YOU FOUND OTHERWISE THEN YOU PROBABLY DID NOT TEST IT WITH SUFFICIENT WEIGHT.

ALREADY BEFORE ANY OF THIS HAPPEN I WAS SHOCKED AND QUESTIONED THE MORALITY OF THIS COURT WITH REGARD TO THE GUNS CASE OF 2008 AND KEPT STRUGGLING NOT TO SEE VOTING POSITIVELY ON THAT WEAK OPINION AS CORRUPTION.