Thursday, May 21, 2015
CORRECTION
DEPENDING ON HOW YOU INTERPRET THE RELEVANT PART IN ARTICLE 3 SECTION 1 MY CLAIM THAT THEY CANT VIOLATE THE GOOD BEHAVIOR REQUIREMENT COULD BE WRONG. HOWEVER IN BOTH INTERPRETATIONS IT WOULD BE CORRECT TO REMOVE FROM OFFICE JUDGES WHO VIOLATE THAT REQUIREMENT EXCEPT THAT IN ONE INTERPRETATION AS OBLIGATION WHILE IN THE OTHER AS AN OPTION.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment