24

EVEN ASSUMING THEY DID NOT FIND SOMETHING OUTRAGEOUS ENOUGH IN THE MERITS RULING OF THE CASE TO GRANT MY PETITION, HOW ABOUT THE PROCEDURAL HANDLING? HOW ABOUT THE WAY THE APPELLATE COURT KEPT GRANTING THE TIME EXTENSION MOTIONS TO A DEFENDANT WITHOUT ANY REAL JUSTIFICATION AND DESPITE THE VERY SEVER REQUIREMENTS ITS OWN RULES PUT ON GRANTING SUCH MOTIONS (ACTUALLY AT SOME LEVEL(S) WHICH WAS/WERE ALSO GRANTED ITS LOCAL RULES DID NOT EVEN GET INTO THAT) ? DID NOT ANY THING SOUND SUSPICIOUS IN SUCH BEHAVIOR AT LEAST BECAUSE HOW MUCH IT CAN SUGGEST TO THE OPPOSING PARTY BIG POTENTIAL BIAS TOWARD THE PARTY GETTING ALL THOSE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULES OF THE COURT IN ADDITION TO THE RULES OF THE  FRAP ?WASNT IT IN ANY WAY WORTH LOOKING AT THE POTENTIAL CORRUPTION IN A COURT MAKING ITSELF LIKE A TOY UNDER THE CONTROL OF ONE SIDE TO THIS LEVEL?  HOW MANY CASES ARE THERE SHOWING BEHAVIOUR AT SIMILAR LEVEL BY OTHER COURTS?

THEN HOW ABOUT THE MOTION GRANTING THE INDEFINITE EXTENSION UNTIL RULING ON AN EARLIER MOTION FILED BY THE SAME DEFENDANT ASKING TO DISMISS MY APPEAL BECAUSE I FOLLOWED THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT OF WAITING FOR FINAL RULING TO FILE MY APPEAL TO THAT CRAP?GRANTING INDEFINITE TIME  EXTENSION UNTIL RULING ON THAT MOTION WAS AGAINST THE LOCAL RULES OF THAT COURT EVEN IF WE WERE TO ASSUME THE EARLIER MOTION STOOD ON ACCEPTABLE GROUNDS IN ITS CLAIM