IF HE REALLY TOOK OWNERSHIP OF HIS ACTIONS AND WANTED TO SETTLE WHAT HELD HIM FROM DOING THAT? HE CAN PARK A CAR BESIDE THE ONE JUST ACROSS A NARROW GRASS SEPARATE FROM MINE IN A GROCERY STORE PARKING AREA FACE TO FACE WITH THE WORD "INFIDEL" AND ITS ARABIC TRANSLATION PRINTED ON THE SPACE FOR FRONTAL LICENCE PLATE BUT HE CANT DELIVER A MESSAGE TO ME? IN FACT, EVEN IF I WERE TO REFUSE ACCESSING MY MAIL OR EMAIL OR TALKING DIRECTLY, THE CAPABILITIES HE HAS SHOWN BY INFILTRATING AND CONTROLLING MY COMPUTERS AND NETWORK INDICATES THAT HE COULD STILL FORCE RECEIVING A MESSAGE ON ME BY MAKING IT APPEAR ON MY SCREEN WHILE I AM USING ANY COMPUTER OF MINE.
BUT HIS ACTIONS NEVER SHOWN SERIOUSNESS IN THAT REGARD AND THE ACTION OF THIS COURT EXPLAINED WHY BY SHOWING HOW MUCH HE IS FAR FROM AND CAN ESCAPE SERIOUS ACCOUNTABILITY TO HIS ACTIONS AND THOSE OF OTHERS INDUCED BY HIM.
No comments:
Post a Comment