IT HAD OCCURRED TO ME MANY TIMES THAT THE GUY COULD BE CONVEYING HIS PHONE CALLS GAME TO THOSE INSIDE THAT COURT BUT KEPT TELLING MYSELF THIS IS THE HIGHEST COURT AND, SUPPOSEDLY, THE BEST THEY COULD BRING HERE SO THEY WOULDN'T DO SUCH A THING.
HOWEVER, I ALSO THOUGHT THAT I TOOK SUFFICIENT PRECAUTION FROM THAT BY KEEPING SILENT. SO IMAGINE, IF STAYING SILENT WAS ENOUGH FOR THEM TO DENY MY PETITION, WASN'T I JUSTIFIED IN AVOIDING NEGOTIATION IN ORDER NOT TO RISK MAKING A DEMAND THAT COULD BE UNACCEPTABLE TO THEM? THE GUY DID NOT TAKE OWNERSHIP TO HIS ACTIONS AND WHAT HE INDUCED LIKE A NORMAL PERSON FOR ANY NEGOTIATION TO OCCUR ANYWAY .
IN ADDITION TO ALL THAT, I THOUGHT THAT THE WORST REACTION FROM THEM THAT COULD OCCUR SHOULD STAY WITHIN THE LIMIT OF BEING JUST. I NEVER THOUGHT ANYTHING WOULD MAKE THEM GO FAR ENOUGH TO DENY MY PETITION EVEN IF THEY WERE ONLY VERY REMOTELY FIT FOR THEIR POSITION IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.
No comments:
Post a Comment