EVEN APPLYING THE EYE FOR AN EYE PRINCIPLE DOES NOT SEEM TO EXTEND TO NOT EXPLAINING THE REASON TO THE GUILTY. A VICTIM CAN DIE WITHOUT KNOWING WHY HE WAS KILLED BUT STILL I DON'T KNOW OF ANY JUSTICE SYSTEM ON EARTH THAT REQUIRES CARRYING THE PUNISHMENT NOT TO TELL THE KILLER WHY HE IS BEING SET TO BE KILLED BEFORE KILLING HIM TO MAKE THINGS EQUAL WITH THE VICTIM IN THAT REGARD. ACTUALLY, IT SEEMS TO BE A NATURALLY REQUIRED THING TO DO IN ALL SYSTEMS FOR CARRYING OUT JUSTICE FROM THE BEGINNING OF HUMANITY.
SO ON WHAT BASIS DID YOU FIND IT ACCEPTABLE NOT TO EXPLAIN WHY DID YOU REFUSE MY PETITION DESPITE ITS COMPELLING CONTENTS?
No comments:
Post a Comment