Aside from the issue of communicating with one party while not even giving the other the opportunity to respond to whatever believe resulted from this communication, is this opportunity to change the issue from the merits of the case to some other thing like the phone calls issue this guy brought open to everybody? Or is it some special treatment the "justices" gave because of their corruption and/or stupidity and allowed this diversion off the issue? Even assuming it is open to everyone, is a communication path through which to change the issue like this guy have with this court also open to everyone?
No comments:
Post a Comment