STARTING FROM THE FIRST LEVEL OF LOOKING AT WHAT HAPPENED HERE , THIS "SUPREME COURT" DID TWO VERY OUTRAGEOUSLY BAD THINGS NOT ONE. THE FIRST IS REFUSING THE PETITION, WITHOUT EVEN ONE PERSON VOICING A DISAGREEMENT TO THAT, WHILE THE SECOND IS NOT CARING OR REFUSING TO EXPLAIN THAT REFUSAL. EVEN WITH CASES WHERE THERE IS MUCH BIGGER SPACE ALLOWING ASSUMPTION OF BEING CORRECT IN DENYING THEM, ONE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DISPUTE THE FACT OF THE EXISTENCE OF A DOUBT TO BE ANSWERED IN AN EXPLANATION.
No comments:
Post a Comment