WHY DO THOSE PEOPLE DENY THAT IN THE JUDICIARY HAVING THE ONE WITH THE BEST JUSTICE VALUES TO BE ON TOP IS THE MOST INDISPENSABLE REQUIREMENT? WHO SAID THAT PERSON HAS TO BE A LAWYER OR EVEN COMES WITH SOME SPECIAL LEVEL OF INTELLIGENCE OR MENTAL CAPABILITIES? YOU MAY BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN THINGS TO A PERSON WHO COMMIT AN HONEST MISTAKE TO CORRECT HIM BUT WHAT CAN YOU DO TO A CORRUPT PERSON? CORRECTING MORALITY IS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT THAN CORRECTING KNOWLEDGE. MOREOVER, A PERSON IN SUCH POSITION CAN HAVE A VERY SUBSTANTIAL LAWYER ASSISTANCE READY TO EXPLAIN THINGS TO HIM. FINALLY THAT PERSON GENERALLY MAY NOT BE EVEN THE ONE MAKING THE DECISIONS. HE MAY JUST CHECK THEM FOR COMPLIANCE WITH BEING JUST AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHEN ISSUED WHILE ALSO STAND READY TO TAKE BACK THINGS FOR CORRECTION IF A JUST OBJECTION GETS RAISED.
IN OTHER WORDS, WHILE THE POSITION OF A JUDGE IS NOT AS MUCH A POLICY MAKING POSITION LIKE THAT OF A PRECEDENT, THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT HAS TO BE A DIRECT ONE AND CANNOT USE CAPABILITIES FROM OTHER PEOPLE IF THAT PROVIDE A BETTER PATH FOR JUSTICE.
No comments:
Post a Comment