Sunday, June 7, 2015

116

I ONCE READ A QUOTE FROM THE ARGUMENT THIS COURT MADE IN SUPPORT OF HOLDING JAPANESE AMERICANS DURING WW2 IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS AND IT SOUNDED TO ME AS OUTRAGEOUS IN ITS WEAKNESS. LATER, ONE DAY I SAW ONE OF THOSE NINE IN A VIDEO WONDERING ABOUT HOW COULD THIS COURT AGREE WITH WHAT HAPPENED DURING THAT TIME AND THOUGHT GOOD SEEMS LIKE THEY NOTICED THAT SO I DO NOT NEED TO PUT MUCH EFFORT POINTING IT OUT TO CORRECT WHATEVER MENTAL SET IT CAME FROM. UNFORTUNATELY, AS WHAT THIS COURT DID HERE SEEMS TO INDICATE, THAT REALIZATION APPARENTLY DID NOT EXCEED BY MUCH THE SUPERFICIALITY OF RECOGNITION AND SELF SCRUTINY FOR MERELY THE FORM.

No comments:

Post a Comment