EVEN FOR JUST THIS CASE THE SITUATION IS THE FURTHEST FROM THE LIKE OF A MADE UP SLIP AND FALL CLAIM. ONE CAN SEE IN THE COMPLAINT THE LEVEL OF OUTRAGEOUS ACTIONS HE STARTED WITH. THEN HE MADE THE DISTRICT COURT DOES WHAT IT DID TO COVER FOR THOSE ACTIONS IN THE MARKET. AFTER THAT HE MADE THE APPELLATE COURT DO ALL THOSE REPREHENSIBLE AND UNJUST ACTIONS TO COVER FOR WHAT HE MADE THE DISTRICT COURT DOES. HE NEVER SHOWED THAT HE CARES OR ACCOUNT FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTIONS ALL ALONG THAT PATH. INSTEAD WHAT HE SHOWED FITS SOMEONE WHO IS CARELESSLY PLAYING AROUND AND ENJOYING HIS POWER TO THE HIGHEST DEGREE. HIS ACTIONS ACTUALLY GAVE THE HARD TO AVOID IMPRESSION OF SOMEONE WHO IS CHALLENGING THE SYSTEM AND NOT MERELY TRYING TO ESCAPE ITS CONSEQUENCES. HE KEPT REPEATING THINGS AND COVERING THE BAD WITH WORSE. THIS KIND OF NOT ONLY CONTINUING A BAD BEHAVIOUR BUT ALSO FOLLOWING A PATH OF CARELESS REPETITION OF SIMILAR ACTIONS COULD SHOW A HIGH LEVEL OF ARROGANCE AND TYRANNY EVEN FOR LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT MISBEHAVIOR. SO HOW ABOUT COMBINING IT WITH THE KIND OF ACTIONS THIS GUY WAS DOING?
No comments:
Post a Comment