IT SEEMS THAT I MISTAKENLY THOUGHT THE STATUTE RELATED TO THE SECOND CASE APPLY TO THE FATHER WHEN IT APPLIES TO BOTH PARENTS. HOWEVER, THE END RESULT REMAINS THE SAME. IT IS THAT THERE SEEMS TO BE A LACK OF SUFFICIENT SUPPORT, AT LEAST WITH CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK, TO TAKE THE STATUTE AS GIVING THE RIGHT TO ONE PARENT TO PUNISH THE OTHER BECAUSE IT WAS INTENDED AS AN ANSWER TO A VIOLATION OF HIS /HER RIGHT BY THE OTHER PARENT'S VIOLATION TO THAT STATUTE OR ON BEHALF OF THE BABY.
No comments:
Post a Comment