239

So the constitution which provided a set of rights to protect people from the actions of those chosen by them to represent them, intended to leave, except for correcting the effect on the case itself as much as possible later, people helpless against the actions of any judiciary entity, which could be comprised of only one person, doing whatever it wants within its jurisdiction? Is this the same constitution available to the public view?

But such understanding could be another consequence to paying insufficient attention to the good Behaviour constitutional requirement and how it seems that it was intended to act on the judiciary taking the role like that of the direct rules constitutional constraints on the legislative branch.