Like that of taking victims right to prosecute, don't get me started on the issue of "Judges Immunity". Two arguments in support of that, the one that the judge should perform his job without fear from such reactions and the one about how such thing could open the door for endless lawsuits, also apply with similar significance on medical doctors. However, doctors can be sued and their decisions could be evaluated by other doctors and those, in turn, could have their evaluation evaluated by other doctors and so on and all could be sued. So why the difference here? Or is it that the minute we find a wiggle room to stray away from justice we immediately use it?
No comments:
Post a Comment