305

continuing from the post below

If you hire somebody to contact another person by phone and he does not leave a voice mail despite that his phone calls were not picked up, would you pay him for that because you think he deserves payment for it? Especially for this guy, do you think that what made the judges of the court deny my petition to begin with was that he only told them that I do not pick up his calls or also that I do not respond to his voice mails? So how much that would cause counting on him to perform at the same level he was complaining about? And remember the calling guy here did not leave a voice mail because he wanted not to leave a voice mail and not because he wished to complete the task of a phone contact but failed because he , for example, forgot or was too lazy.

As for what I described as essential dependency for the two weeks or so of the phone calls on my cell phone before I changed my number, I am far from believing that not receiving them would have made me initiate an offer for the guy or declare abandonment for my case .    

   

304

continuing from the post below.

I just noticed this. This is in addition to all other things. A big part of my essential dependency on the phone calls this guy was making after the denial of my petition happened later and was based on the continuation of those calls. But when I checked all the voice mails on my land line and all the voice mails all the way back to when I changed my phone number about two weeks after the denial of my petition on my cell phone, I found no voice mail stating anything about the matter. So even if the guy was following what he was being told in doing something he was not required to do, how much credit does he deserve given his intentional nonperformance of what could be as an essential requirement in executing what he was told to do as leaving a voice mail for his calls? In other words, regardless of how much I benefited from his actions, if he didn't do what he was told to do, how much credit does he deserve for it? 

There is absolutely no way somebody not connected to him was making all those calls to my cell phone. 

Even assuming he left serious message about the matter on my cell phone during the first two weeks before I changed the number, it is the continuity of the calls that sufficiently suggested to me that those calls are not part of conciliatory compensation the reason at least partly for which I changed my phone number as a response.      

303

Did I feel an essential dependency on something I heard from one of the Judges of the court to continue my case and stay on my position? The answer to that is no. 

Giving up on my case before going all the way to the end doesn't even have a word in my dictionary. 

But did I feel an essential dependency on the phone calls I received after denying my petition to continue my case and stay on my position? The answer to that is yes.