Thursday, March 3, 2016

296

Continuing from post 293
It felt surprisingly unfair that despite all what I have shown earlier in my behaviour, it looked like it was understood to be much more of working on the likelihood of success and much less of simply revolting. And this came in a place where some may claim that the popularity of an actor prevented them from attempting to come out with their big allegations against him. What is next? Yao Ming fails a job test in China because he is not tall enough?
Aside from being counted on me as if they were direct communications, I also never expected that not taking as more than readiness to look at the case and making the court accessible, whatever signs judges in the court probably shown, to be counted on me as a bad thing. That is especially true for people holding positions involving thinking like there and their familiarity with how much thinking could pass through various stages before making a decision or reaching certainty. 
But even before all of that, it is hard to see how some may struggle with not generalizing on others here the actions of some they may not have ever known or probably even been in the same country before but it was supposed to be easy for me to count on people in the same system coming from the same profession despite all that which happened to me earlier. 

No comments:

Post a Comment